狡
- cunning;
- sly;
- crafty;
Etymology
A phono-semantic compound composed of:
犬 (dog; beast) — semantic component, indicates animal instinct or behavior viewed as morally suspect or uncontrolled;
交 (to mix; to associate; to cross) — phonetic component, supplies the sound "gyo" and suggests interaction, maneuvering, or entanglement.
The structure conveys the idea of animal-like cleverness used through interaction and manipulation, forming the basis of the meaning “cunning.”
Usage in Korean
Core compounds:
교활 (狡猾) — cunning; sly
간교 (奸狡) — treacherous and crafty
Additional notes
狡 refers to cleverness used for self-serving or deceptive purposes.
Unlike neutral intelligence, it implies:
- calculation
- trickery
- moral ambiguity or negativity
It evaluates character, not merely a single deceptive act.
狡 focuses on tactical cleverness rather than brute deception.
Often paired with 猾, where:
狡 — emphasizes scheming cleverness
猾 — emphasizes sly, slippery behavior
Both contrast with:
智 — wisdom (neutral / positive)
慧 — insight
Related characters:
猾 — sly; crafty (behavioral emphasis)
奸 — treacherous; wicked
詐 — deception; fraud
偽 — false; fake
智 — wisdom (contrast)
Among these, 狡 most clearly expresses calculated cleverness used for manipulation, rather than raw deceit or moral corruption.
The animal radical reinforces the view of such cleverness as instinct-driven rather than ethically guided.
Classical texts frequently use 狡 to describe political schemers, rebels, or manipulative advisers.
Classical citations:
《左傳》 (Zuo Zhuan)
「狡者多計」
“The cunning are full of schemes”
《史記》 (Records of the Grand Historian)
「其人狡而多詐」
“That man was cunning and full of deceit”
Words that derived from 狡
- 大竹卜金大 (KHYCK)
- ⿰ 犭 交